Does MMR favour BTL over residential homebuyers?

Private Finance has said that MMR has created a bias in lending which favours investors over residential homebuyers, especially in areas where property prices continue to rise.

Related topics:  Finance News
Rozi Jones
28th July 2015
coin money house grow

Figures have shown that the Mortgage Market Review has caused a general slowdown in the residential mortgage market. Private Finance has said that capping mortgages at a certain income multiple combined with limiting the Help to Buy scheme is therefore not supporting home ownership and suggests that MMR might be having a negative impact on the most vulnerable section of the market.

In contrast, the broker has said that whilst the Buy to Let sector continues to succeed in providing a ready supply of generally well managed property, it remains non-regulated with lenders being ‘free from the constraints of MMR’ and able to advance up to 85% LTV interest only mortgages to BTL landlords.

Simon Checkley, Managing Director of Private Finance, said that the Government and Regulator should encourage lenders to accommodate all home movers with more innovative and flexible products, for example to offer the first 2 years of the mortgage on an interest only basis.

Simon Checkley added:

"The outlook for house price growth remains heavily influenced by the BTL sector. Therefore, we are calling on regulators and policy makers to consider the effects of MMR on residential lending levels which, if maintained at their current level, could potentially exclude an entire generation of home buyers from the property market and force them into the private rental sector for years to come.

"Stifling activity in the housing market increases house prices by reducing supply; if existing homeowners had access to mortgage products which promoted affordability they might be inclined to bring their properties to the market thus increasing supply. These measures coupled with policies promoting development and house building could stimulate an otherwise lacklustre property market whilst simultaneously stirring up general economic activity.

"Not allowing first time buyers access to mortgage products similar to those available to buy to let investors snapping up the same properties that first time buyers would choose to buy if they could afford them, also seems rather unfair. In theory, property prices and rent should rise in line with inflation and therefore owning a property with a mortgage which allows for interest only payments for an initial period is still preferable in many cases to being forced to rent property from the landlords fuelling the market."

More like this
CLOSE
Subscribe
to our newsletter

Join a community of over 30,000 intermediaries and keep up-to-date with industry news and upcoming events via our newsletter.