FCA fines compliance officer £75,000 for pension transfer failings

FCA fines compliance officer £75,000 for pension transfer failings
Mr Watters also failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that advisers were properly monitored to reduce the risk of unsuitable ETV pension transfer advice being given

The FCA has fined David Watters £75,000 for "failing to exercise due skill, care and diligence" in his role as a compliance oversight officer at at FGS McClure Watters and Lanyon Astor Buller.

Following an investigation, the FCA found that Mr Watters failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the process in place for giving advice on Enhanced Transfer Valuepension transfer exercises was adequate and met regulatory standards.

The FCA says this led to a serious risk of unsuitable advice being given to customers of FGS and LAB about the merits of transferring their pension, from a defined benefit to a defined contribution scheme, as part of an ETV pension transfer exercise. 


Approximately 500 customers that received advice from FGS or LAB transferred their pensions from a DB scheme to a DC scheme, with a combined value of approximately £12.7 million. In many cases, it may have been unnecessary for customers to leave their DB schemes, thereby losing their guaranteed benefits. LAB has agreed to contact affected customers and where loss has been caused, it will pay appropriate redress.

In a statement, the FCA said: "Mr Watters failed to give sufficient consideration to whether the advice process was compliant; he did not take reasonable steps to gain a sufficient understanding of the relevant regulatory requirements; and did not obtain an appropriate third party review of the processes to ensure compliance. Mr Watters also failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that advisers were properly monitored to reduce the risk of unsuitable ETV pension transfer advice being given to customers.

"ETV exercises incentivise customers to transfer their pensions. During these exercises, it is vital that customers considering giving up their guaranteed benefits are given suitable advice on the real benefits and consequences so that they can properly conclude whether a transfer is in their best interests."

Mark Steward, Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, said: “It was Mr Watters’ responsibility to take reasonable steps to put in place a compliant advice process. His failure to do this placed customers at risk of needlessly losing valuable benefits for their retirement.”

Join our mailing list:

Leave a comment



Latest Money Careers

Related stories

More articles from Retirement